Archive for the ‘Features & Special Reports’ Category

Professors: Babies Don’t Know They’re Killed in Abortions

Wednesday, May 9th, 2012

by Warner T. Huston | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 5/7/12 5:04 PM

In February of 2012, a pair of left-wing “philosophers” wrote a paper that claimed that babies aren’t human until they can become cognizant of themselves, aware that if they were to be “aborted” or killed they’d be losing something valuable, their lives.

This, they claimed, justified abortion as well as post birth infanticide. Naturally they had elaborate justifications for their stance and what they wrote is chilling indeed, for it essentially states that only people that think like them are really worth the status of “human,” worth having their lives considered sacrosanct.

The pair, Alberto Giubilini of Milan, Italy, and Francesca Minerva of Australia, held as a central thesis that since abortion is so commonly accepted there had to be a more expansive use for it. That use, the pair decided, should be to cover killing babies born with developmental problems. After all, they said, neither fetuses or newborns “have the same moral status as actual persons,” so this certainly must mean that newborns with catastrophic birth defects could be killed without any moral reservations.

Here is how they justified the non-human status of both a fetus and a born baby.

The moral status of an infant is equivalent to that of a fetus in the sense that both lack those properties that justify the attribution of a right to life to an individual.

Both a fetus and a newborn certainly are human beings and potential persons, but neither is a ‘person’ in the sense of ‘subject of a moral right to life’. We take ‘person’ to mean an individual who is capable of attributing to her own existence some (at least) basic value such that being deprived of this existence represents a loss to her. This means that many non-human animals and mentally retarded human individuals are persons, but that all the individuals who are not in the condition of attributing any value to their own existence are not persons. Merely being human is not in itself a reason for ascribing someone a right to life. Indeed, many humans are not considered subjects of a right to life: spare embryos where research on embryo stem cells is permitted, fetuses where abortion is permitted, criminals where capital punishment is legal.

This is chilling for its cold approach to life, but worse for its vagueness.

Let’s examine the main point of what makes someone a worthy human in these liberal’s minds. They feel that unless someone can understand the “basic value” of their own life, then they don’t count for personhood.

This is so entirely ague that anyone can qualify for elimination in a large number of situations.

The pair mentions that mentally retarded people can qualify for elimination, that they aren’t cognizant of the value of their own lives. But are you aware of yourself when you are in a coma from an accident? Are you any longer aware of yourself if you have Alzheimer’s? How about if you have devolved to infantile status at the end of your life? Should your children have the right to just kill you instead of keeping you alive in that case?

How far does this “thought” criteria go? Can these “philosophers” decide that if you are happy drinking beer, working as a car mechanic, and watching reality TV that this isn’t enough cognition to qualify to be self-aware? Could they decide that unless you think exactly like them, why, you aren’t properly a human? Of course they could because they would be in charge of deciding what “thought” qualifies as enough to make you a real person.

Imagine what this means? It means that the left is leaving behind its reliance on “science” and alighting on “thought” to serve as a basis to assess who is worth what. No longer is mere biology something worth considering. That long-held justification for abortion using the unviable cells argument is now out. Instead we will henceforth set out to determine if people are thinking properly to ascertain if they are worth keeping alive.

Chilling, no?

Worse, imagine how much more dangerous these ideas will become when governments decide to use them as a basis for policy! We will have governments determining who is “worth” being called a human based on how the person being judged thinks.

Extremely chilling, indeed.

LifeNews.com Note: Warner Todd Huston is an editorial columnist whose work is featured on numerous web sites. He has also written for several history magazines, and appears in the new book “Americans on Politics, Policy and Pop Culture.”

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/05/07/professors-babies-dont-know-theyre-killed-in-abortions/

No Disease, Disability Can Take Away Our Human Dignity

Friday, April 27th, 2012

by Pamela Muller Swartzberg | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 4/25/12 4:10 PM

I have been a pro-life advocate for as long as I can remember. In recent years, my passion for life has grown to include a deeper understanding that pro-life advocacy is about much more than abortion. “Pro-life” encompasses all life, a fact which became abundantly clear to me as I walked with my father in the culmination of his life’s journey – walked with him through the years of Alzheimer’s disease.

Let me tell you a bit about my father, Jim, who passed away 3 years ago. Dad was and remains a hero. He was a helicopter pilot in the Korean War where he flew rescue missions that saved the lives of countless soldiers. He was a brilliant student and later a leader in his industry. He was a husband, father and grandfather beyond description. All who encountered him, whether in their personal lives or in business, knew immediately that they had met a master – a truly honorable, kind, generous man of great depth and humility.

Dad dealt with life’s triumphs and hardships with a grace and peace we should all strive to imitate. When he was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s, this did not change. He accepted his particular hardship with the same faith and trust that guided his whole life. Together with my mom, he continued to teach all who met him. In fact, he continues to teach and guide us all today.

My family has formed a team to raise awareness of this disease and those families who suffer through it. It is named “Jim’s Journey” because our dad’s whole life was a faith-filled journey attesting to the dignity of the human person in all he did. His earthly journey completed, we know he continues to guide us from his eternal resting place. I know I speak for my family, too. One of my nieces commented, while dad was still with us, that, “We can still sense our Grandpa, our leader, our role model … underneath the skin, and no disease can ever take his spirit away.” Another of his grandchildren, after his death, said, “To this day, the lessons of his life continue to shape the pattern of my own … he taught me empathy and compassion … the meaning of loving sacrifice … humility in the midst of success.” We all learned so much from mom and dad our whole lives, perhaps never more than during his last few years.

Often, when we hear about Alzheimer’s disease, we hear of “the loss of dignity” or that our loved one “isn’t really there anymore.” I reject that characterization. No disease can take away a person’s humanity. Ask anyone who encountered my mom and dad during his illness; to a person they will attest to the dignity and beauty exhibited by the obvious and total self-giving love between my parents.

We all wish dad didn’t have to suffer with Alzheimer’s disease. And we will continue to do what we can to bring about a world without Alzheimer’s. In the meantime, Jim’s Journey continues, and we joyfully celebrate the gift that was his earthly life.

I close with this verse that so well captures the essence of dad’s life:

Heaven’s heroes never carve their name
On marbled columns built for earthly fame;
They build instead a legacy that springs
From faithful service to the King of Kings.

Requiescat in pace, Daddy.

LifeNews Note:  The following was taken from remarks by Pamela Muller Swartzberg given at the New Jersey chapter of the Alzheimer’s Association following the death of her father. This originally appeared in Human Life International’s Truth and Charity Forum and is reprinted with permission.

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/04/25/no-disease-disability-can-take-away-our-human-dignity/


Seven-Year-Old Girl Born With No Hands Wins Penmanship Award

Friday, April 27th, 2012

by Andrew Bair | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 4/25/12 3:39 PM

A 7-year old girl born without hands named Annie Clark from the Pittsburgh area has won a penmanship award and $1000 prize from Zaner-Bloser, Inc., a company that publishes language arts and reading textbooks. The company recognized Annie Clark at Wilson Christian Academy in West Mifflin on Wednesday with its first-ever Nicholas Maxim Award. (Nicholas was a Maine fifth-grader born without hands or lower arms who entered the company’s penmanship contest last year. His work left such an impression on the judges that they created a new category for students with disabilities.)

Tragically, many children like Annie are never given the chance to share their talents with the world. Children with disabilities are routinely targeted for abortion, often at the recommendation of the medical community. For instance, statistics show as high as 90% or more of unborn children diagnosed with Down syndrome are aborted.

Annie’s parents, Tom and Mary Ellen Clark, have nine children- three biological and six adopted from China. Four of the adoptees from China, including Annie, have disabilities that affect their hands or arms. The family also has an adopted daughter Alyssa and a biological daughter Abbey, who both have Down syndrome.

“Each time, we weren’t looking to adopt a special-needs child, but that is what happened,” said Mary Ellen told the Associated Press. “This was the family God wanted for us.” She hopes Annie’s award encourages her daughter “that she can do anything.”

The family says Annie has learned to paint, draw and color. She also swims, dresses, eats meals and opens cans of soda by herself, and uses her iPod touch and computers without assistance. She hopes to someday write books about animals.

“She’s an amazing little girl,” said her father Tom, “It’s a shame because society places so many rules on how people should look, but the minds of these kids are phenomenal.”

In a society in which YouTube videos about human rights can go viral within hours and awaken the consciousness of millions of Americans and even members of Congress, it’s unthinkable that the plight of children with disabilities continues to go unnoticed. Anyone who has interacted with people with disabilities knows the immense joy they bring to the world. People with disabilities face unique challenges and difficulties but their lives enrich the world in which we live. The American Journal of Medical Genetics released a study showing that 99 percent of people with Down syndrome reported being happy with their lives.

Yet over 90%+ never get to live their lives beyond a few months in the womb. Is our society really better off denying the right to life to children with disabilities? Children like little Annie Clark give us just a glimpse of what we are missing in aborting so many children with disabilities.

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/04/25/seven-year-old-girl-born-with-no-hands-wins-penmanship-award/

The HHS Mandate and the RH Bill:Lessons on Parallelism

Tuesday, April 24th, 2012

By Anthony Perez, Pro-Life Philippines

American conservatives were up in arms against the HHS mandate (Health and Human Services Mandate) of President Barack Obama, a mandate which will force every employer, including Catholics, to provide contraception and abortifacient pills to their employees. This is, of course, a slap against religious freedom, and the resulting backlash has seen not only Catholics but other denominations as well condemning this mandate. To ask Catholics to go against what their faith teaches is a clear violation of the often-misunderstood separation of Church and State. The US government has no right to prevent Catholics from living their faith nor does it have any right to implement a law or a provision that would go against their religion. All over the country, protests sparked out in defiance of the HHS mandate. Men, women, the young, the old, clergy, and laity, Catholics and even those who aren’t Catholic went out, joined the protests, and spoke their minds about the whole issue of their religious freedom which is at stake.

The same thing should be happening to our country. Like the Americans, we have a president who thinks he can have his way against the religious, faithful CatholIc, and a pending bill that is set to trample the religious freedom of millions of Catholics around the country. The RH Bill (Reproductive Health Bill) , currently HB 4244 in Congress & SB 2865 in Senate, has  provisions that go against many of the precepts of the Catholic Church, and this makes Her the bill’s number one enemy.

Central to the HHS mandate and the RH Bill are the distribution of contraception. The Catholic Church has been consistent in its denunciation of contraception, which it considers as intrinsically evil. She teaches that the sexual act, aside from the fact that it is reserved for those who are bound in the sacrament of marriage, has two aspects – the unitive and procreative – and these two aspects must always be present. The denial of the procreative side of the sexual act, which happens whenever the couple uses contraceptives, means that sex is debased and is made into just an activity for pleasure. It could also mean that the woman is objectified as a thing meant for achieving a sexual high.

In the United States, the mass distribution of contraceptives by the government happened a mere few years before Roe V Wade, which gives you an idea of how things spiral downwards so quickly with a country that adopts a contraceptive mentality. And we all know what Roe V Wade did to American Society: 54 million deaths and counting. To think it all began with a rather innocent but entirely wrong notion of sex: “Look dear, we can now do it without you getting pregnant!”

If everything were a game of chess, then President Obama is now executing his endgame moves, with the HHS mandate and the end of religious freedom as his idea of a checkmate and victory. Game over. Destroy the remaining resistance – the Catholic Church – by forcing them to adopt this lifestyle that the liberals have been living, not to say that many Catholics have been using contraceptives anyway. It was a dangerous gambit, by the way, and the backlash against Obama’s obvious trampling of religious freedom has been overwhelming. Everything is still hanging in the balance.

Today, the RH Bill, and consequently our country’s future, hang in the balance as well. With everything still to play for, both sides are deadlocked in a slug fest and no one is giving up the fight yet. For us in the pro-life side, we only have to look at the United States in order to be reminded of what we do not want to become: a society filled with modernism and emptiness, a society that for the most part does not respect life, and it all began with the simple use of contraceptives. Pope Paul VI prophesied correctly when he said that the mass distribution of contraceptives will result in a lot of evil, namely: the loss of respect for women, women claiming that their bodies are theirs alone, rise in infidelity and a general decline on morality, and governments’ abuse of power especially in matters where they shouldn’t even be delving into (such as population and family matters). This has been happening on a large scale in countries that disregarded Humanae Vitae; fortunately for us, our bishops decided to be faithful to Pope Paul VI and on the teachings of the Church. This might be the reason why our country holds fast to its Catholic and Filipino values. Nevertheless, like the Americans, who zealously stand guard over their freedoms, we should be eternally vigilant in order to ensure that the RH Bill does not pass.

Because we all know what happens next if the RH Bill passes.

 

Doctor exposes the evil behind the Pill

Monday, June 13th, 2011

I have prescribed “the Pill” since 1978. My wife and I used the Pill for years, having no moral concerns about Then, in 1995 my friend and practice partner John Hartman, MD, showed me a patient information brochure—given to him by a friend—that claimed the Pill had a postfertilization effect causing “ . . . the unrecognized loss of preborn children.”

John asked me if I had ever heard of such a thing. I had not. I did read the brochure and its claims seemed to be outlandish, excessive, and inaccurate. So, I decided to begin a literature search to disprove these claims to my partner, myself, and any patients who might ask about it. The more research I did, the more concerned I became about my findings. I called researchers around the country and interviewed them. During this process I met Joe Stanford, MD. Joe volunteered to assist in the research that ultimately became this systematic review. We were concerned enough about our findings and about the fact that so many of our colleagues and patients seemed to share our ignorance about this potential effect that we presented the preliminary results of our research at a number of research forums, just to see if we were off base. Most of the reviewers suggested that, although this evidence was new to them (as it was to us), it seemed accurate and not off target.

Furthermore, several said that they thought it would change the way family physicians informed their patients about the Pill and its potential effects.

The most difficult part of this research was deciding how to apply it to my practice. I discussed it with my partners, my patients, ethicists I know and respect, and pastors in my community. I studied the ethical principle of double effect and discussed the issue with religious physicians of several faiths. Finally, after many months of debate and prayer, I decided in 1998 to no longer prescribe the Pill. As a family physician, my career has been committed to family care from conception to death. Since the evidence indicated to me that the Pill could have a postfertilization effect, I felt I could no longer, in good conscience, prescribe it—especially since viable alternatives are available. The support and encouragement that my partners, staff, and patients have given me has been unexpectedly affirming. It seems that my patients have appreciated the information

I have given them. Many have been surprised or even shocked (as I was) to learn about this potential effect. Many of my patients have chosen to continue taking the Pill, and we have physicians in our practice and community who will prescribe it for them. Patients who take the Pill tell me that they are much more careful with their compliance. Others have chosen other birth control options—especially one of the modern methods of natural family planning. So, this is research that has changed my soul and my practice. It has been an extraordinarily difficult issue with which I have had to wrestle. I suspect it will be so for many who thoughtfully read and consider the evidence contained in this review.

Walter L. Larimore, MD

Kissimmee, Fla

To download Dr. Larimore’s study, click here.

More about Pro-Life Month speaker Michael Voris

Thursday, February 10th, 2011

voris4At 49, Michael Voris, S.T.B., president and founder of St. Michael’s Media, is among the generations of Catholics who simply didn’t receive thorough and accurate catechesis. Through his Catholic television show, The One True Faith, and his collaboration with www.realcatholictv.com, Mr. Voris intends to change that.

Voris graduated from Notre Dame in 1983 with a degree in Communications and concentrated studies in history and politics. Equally impressive is his theological education. He not only trained as a young man in theology at the doctrinally-sound St. Joseph’s Seminary in New York, but in April of 2009, he received his Sacred Theology Baccalaureate (STB) from Sacred Heart Major Seminary/Angelicum in Rome – Magna Cum Laude.

He spent a number of years working as a CBS affiliate anchor, producer and reporter, in various markets, winning multiple Emmys for his work in broadcast news. Working in the secular media provided him with not only the technical knowledge to produce excellent television programming, but a profound grasp of the need to produce programs that leave the viewer improved spiritually rather than merely entertained.

On May 8, 2006, Voris opened St. Michael’s Media, a new state-of-the-art digital television studio, dedicated to the archangel whose Scripture promises will lead the victorious battle against Satan at the end of time (Rev 12:07). Located in Ferndale, MI, it is the production center of broadcast quality Catholic programs, designed to educate a generation of Catholics largely ignorant of Church teaching and to save souls from eternal damnation.

On September 1, 2008, he partnered with www.realcatholictv.com – the first ever online Catholic television station. Realizing that the internet is where it’s at, Voris and St. Michael’s Media began producing daily Catholic programming for viewers and subscribers of www.realcatholictv.com. Catholic News Roundup, The Shadow Priest and the ever popular, The Vortex, of which Michael Voris is the creator and host and which has been seen by millions of viewers, are just a few of the many innovative programs you will find on www.RealCatholicTV.com.

With a passion for saving souls, Voris epitomizes what it means to be a member of the Catholic laity today – to live out each day, what is meant by the new evangelization, utilizing the tools of the 21st century.

A Pro-Life Mission to Southeast Asia

Monday, September 20th, 2010

logo_smSince its founding nearly four decades ago, Human Life International’s people have traveled eight million miles to 155 different nations. We have a presence in over one hundred countries now, and we train and speak directly to tens of thousands of people every year.

Today the need for HLI’s missionary work is greater than ever. I was reminded of this fact last week as I stared up at the brand-new five-story building in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, which houses three of the most aggressive population control organizations in the world — EngenderHealth (formerly AVSC), the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), and RACHA, the Reproductive and Child Health Alliance. I admired the twenty or so sparkling new SUVs in the parking lot, and watched dozens of well-dressed workers walk in and out.

The tens of millions of dollars spent by the population controllers in Cambodia every year is having a profound effect. Forty years ago, the average Cambodian woman had six children; today she has three, and the fertility rate is projected to decline soon to only 1.4 children per family, a plunge of 77 percent.

Cambodia is a classic example of how the anti-lifers create a problem and then dedicate themselves to making the problem even worse. Today, most of the major organs of the United Nations are prominently visibly present in Phnom Penh — UNAIDS, UNCEDAW, UNDESA, UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF, the World Bank, the World Health Organization, and many others — a regular alphabet soup of well-funded agencies all created to “improve” the lives of the people, and all largely dedicated to the promotion of contraception and the eradication of AIDS.

Immediately after the murderous Pol Pot regime fell in 1992, Cambodia was essentially a closed society, with no recorded cases of HIV. But when UN peacekeepers appeared that year, brothels immediately sprang up all over Phnom Penh, and the soldier’s appetite for sex jump-started the AIDS epidemic. Within two years, there were more than 20,000 recorded cases of HIV. At the onset of the UN mission, the head of the peacekeeping forces, Yasushi Akashi, said: “Everybody has the right, even the soldiers, to enjoy the young ladies, and we cannot discriminate against the HIV-positive soldiers.”

The country is still a wild place today, with rampant sex slavery, millions of land mines still in place, and even an American-run euthanasia clinic masquerading as a coffee shop (which, thankfully, was recently closed down by the government).

My wife Kathy and I traveled to Cambodia and Thailand to help the Filipino charismatic group Couples for Christ-Foundation for Family Life organize to promote the pro-life message. Both of these nations are overwhelmingly Buddhist (about 96 percent) and less than one percent are Christian, presenting interesting and unique challenges. One of CFC-FFL’s pillars of activism is pro-life, and HLI has worked with the organization extensively over the years by providing education, materials, training in organization, and other efforts.

cfcffl-logoThe objective was to inform the CFC-FFL members about a range of pro-life issues. I spoke to ten groups over the weekend in Phnom Penh, including the population control agenda, abortion myths, statistics, and demographic impacts, fetal development, chastity, and how to debate and organize a pro-life group. Everyone received a copy of HLI’s Pro-Life CD Library for further study, and we had a lot of discussion time. On the spur of the moment, the Salesian Sisters of Don Bosco (SDB) asked Kathy and I to give evening talks the night before leaving for Thailand. On our way to their monastery, the roads flooded from the rain, and we left a wake behind us as we slowly made our way there. I have never seen anything like it.

The sisters were so encouraged by the talks that they invited us back to talk to the more than 900 teenage girls they teach at their school. The SDB Brothers teach about the same number of boys, and I promised the sisters that HLI will help them teach their kids about chastity and living by God’s plan, even if most of them are not Catholic.

Then it was on to Bangkok to meet with our CFC-FFL friends in Thailand. Wherever we go, the Filipinos are there to spread the Gospel. They are truly the “yeast of the Faith.”

Thailand instituted a “100 percent condom use program” twenty years ago, and the results have been predictable: More than 650,000 people have died from AIDS, and half a million more live with the virus. Thailand has the highest adult HIV infection rate in all of Asia. Massive UN reports on the situation in Thailand prattle on endlessly about such things as “stigma indexes,” while almost completely ignoring behavior change (except for inducing people to use more and more condoms).

Meanwhile, in the Philippines, where condom use has (until recently) been strongly discouraged, there have been less than 3,000 cases of the disease among a significantly larger population of adults.

To summarize, one in seven thousand Filipino adults are infected with HIV/AIDS, while one in seventy Thai adults are infected — a rate one hundred times higher. The stark difference between these two nations demonstrates the futility of condom promotion as a solution to the HIV/AIDS epidemic.

The hardest part of any journey is leaving our fired-up and faithful pro-life friends and returning to “home base.” The second hardest part is sitting on airplanes for nearly twenty hours in seats seemingly designed for some kind of invertebrate creature. But Kathy and I are both confident that the pro-life mission will flourish in these most difficult countries of Cambodia and Thailand, and Human Life International will be there to help it happen, as it has in so many other countries of the world.

Finally, we must pass along greetings and a hearty “Thank you!” from our friends in Southeast Asia, who, thanks to your generosity, are receiving the tools to help defend their future, their children.

Sincerely,

Clowes2Brian Clowes, PhD
Director, Research and Training Worldwide
Human Life International

Commentary: Why Abortion Does Not Solve Child Rape

Wednesday, April 28th, 2010

THERE is no tragedy that the abortion movement does not seek to turn to its own advantage.

Consider the case of a young girl in Quintana Roo, Mexico, who was raped by her supposed stepfather and impregnated at the tender age of 10. After the girl’s mother belatedly notified the authorities, she is now, at nearly 18 weeks of pregnancy, receiving proper medical care. The offending rapist has since been arrested.

We should all decry the horrific sexual abuse that led to this pregnancy. But the abortion movement, led by radical feminists, wants to go further. They claim that the girl should be given an abortion, even though the Mexican state in which she lives, Quintana Roo, forbids all abortions after 90 days gestation. The underlying problem here, they insist, is that Mexican girls are not properly informed of their “right” to an abortion in case of rape before 90 days gestation, and that they are not allowed to receive one after that point. According to them, Mexico’s abortion laws must be relaxed.

According to CNN, which in its story on this child rape only interviewed abortion advocates (See CNN s coverage of the story):

“This girl is much more than an isolated case,” said Adriana Ortiz-Ortega, a researcher at Mexico’s National Autonomous University who has written two books on abortion in Mexico, “and there is much more influence now from conservative groups that are trying to prevent the legalization of abortion.”…

Child protective services officials in Quintana Roo said in a statement last week that the girl and the fetus were in good health.

But Quintana Roo state legislator Maria Hadad said the girl’s doctors aren’t telling the whole story. She said continuing the pregnancy could cause severe mental and physical health problems for the girl. “It’s not just a high-risk pregnancy. It’s a pregnancy that puts the girl at risk,” Hadad told Mexican broadcaster Channel 10 in Chetumal, Mexico.

This girl has surely been horrifically damaged by what has been done to her, but will subjecting her to an abortion—as Maria Hadad advocates—somehow begin to “repair” this damage? Obviously not, as any person who is truly concerned about the welfare of the girl would conclude. It would only add tragedy to tragedy. And why would Hadad attack the girl’s doctors, going so far as to suggest that they may be involved in a cover up? The reason is that Hadad and others like her are not the least bit concerned about the girl as a person. The victim is only a political tool, whose pain can be commoditized to advocate the legalization of abortion on demand. That there is another tiny person involved does not even enter into their calculations.

The political gamesmanship around this case distracts the public from the underlying problem: the family breakdown and pedophilia that allowed a young girl to not only be raped, but also impregnated by her supposed “step-father.”

yxwors8qAccording to Christine De Vollmer, president of the Latin American Alliance for the Family, a girl this young was unlikely to become pregnant from a single instance of rape. It is common, De Vollmer said, for “everybody to live in the same little house and sleep in the same bed.  And of course all kinds of things happen there, unfortunately including to children. As the bodies of these little girls are stimulated, they begin to ovulate and become pregnant at some point.” As far as the so-called “stepfather” is concerned, this is often just a man who lives in the home with the mother and her children, “without any serious commitment.”

According to De Vollmer, the legalization of abortion will only serve to further enable child rape, since “the visible consequences (of rape) will be taken away. It would be more objective, engaging, and caring to prevent or correct these very common and dangerous situations of promiscuity to young girls before it’s too late. How can politicians rend their garments over these pregnancies and at the same time turn a blind eye to the sexual abuse that goes on daily in broken homes? If nothing is done to stop the abuse, it can only end in pregnancy.”

Carlos Polo, head of PRI’s Latin American office, noted to CNA that the abortion lobbyists are using such tragedies to advance abortion on demand. These activists are “absolute vultures,” who seize upon such cases for their propaganda value, arguing that only way to save the lives of women and girls in such circumstances is to “legalize so-called ‘therapeutic abortion.’” Polo said to PRI that “they care nothing about the girl herself, and abandon her as soon as they are done using her.”

The proper approach to such tragedies involves a consistent ethic of life. The crime of abortion cannot cancel out the crime of rape, as the radical feminists in effect argue. The rape can never be undone, nor can the girl ever return to her prior innocent state.

Yet the innocent human life inside her womb—however sad the circumstance under which it was conceived—can be preserved and protected, as well as the girl herself.

Only a consistent ethic of life will insist on the right of prepubescent girls not to be sexually abused; at the same time it will trumpet the right of a tiny unborn human to live.

Any other position betrays them both.

Credits:

Original article by Colin Mason and Steven W. Mosher for lifesitenews.com last 04/27/10

HLI prexy pays tribute to founder Fr. Marx

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

Human Life International President Rev. Fr. Thomas J. Euteneuer recently released a special edition of “Spirit & Life” of which is dedicated to the group’s founding father Rev. Fr. Paul Marx. Below is a copy of the online version Fr. Euteneuer wrote:

The Passing of the Patriarch of the Pro-Life Movementslidefrmarxmem1

SPECIAL EDITION

Abbot John Klassen, OSB of St. John’s Abbey, Collegeville, Minnesota, informed me personally Saturday that the venerable founder of Human Life International, Fr. Paul Marx, went to his eternal reward peacefully at 8:10 that morning. According to eyewitness accounts, Father raised his hands as he died and said, “Take me home.” Fittingly, he passed away in the Year for Priests, just short of his 90th birthday. Needless to say, he will be sorely missed!

Fr. Marx founded HLI as the Human Life Center in 1972 as a priestly response to what he saw was the global anti-life onslaught that was beginning to wash over the world with oceans of the blood of innocents. As a strong spiritual father, he could not stand by and watch this evil threaten the lives of God’s precious children and the sacred institution of marriage. He infiltrated a pro-abortion conference in California in 1971 as Dr. Paul Marx (correctly so, as he had a PhD in Sociology) and taped all the proceedings of the abortion-promoters so that he could expose their evil. He did this in the book, The Death Peddlers, which was the first major work of his many writings bringing the profound evil of the abortion industry to the light. Father’s legacy of exposing evil and defending the Church’s teaching about the sanctity of human life, marriage and family remains deeply embedded in the hearts of those who continue pro-life work in his indomitable spirit.

I had the privilege of meeting Fr. Marx for the first time only after he had left HLI. One cannot imagine the difficulty of taking over at HLI and trying to fill the shoes of one whom Pope John II called “the Apostle of Life.” After getting to know him, I have always said that there is only one “Apostle” of Life – the rest of us are just “missionaries” of life. Indeed, Father was in every way a unique and unrepeatable gift to the Church and to the world. Like his namesake, St. Paul of old, he went about the entire known world preaching the Gospel of Christ from the 60s through the 90s and establishing apostolic groups and pro-life organizations of faith to carry on the mission. Father was very much like the sower who went out sowing the good seed of life in 91 nations, personally, and motivating scores of others around the world to do the same. We estimate that Father Marx travelled something on the order of 3 million miles in his 40+ year career of pro-life activism, and ever after that, his spiritual children have done the same. In 2009 alone, HLI missionaries from the USA, and our Regional Coordinators, travelled more than 575,000 mission miles and visited 57 countries in our attempt to live up to Father’s high standard of zeal in spreading the Gospel of Life!

Part of Fr. Marx’s legacy can be counted in such HLI programs as the Magdalene Rescue and Rehabilitation Program, the China Orphanage Program, Seminarians for Life, the Population Research Institute (PRI) and the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute (C-Fam), all founded under HLI’s umbrella in the 90s.

Although the Apostle of Life led a retiring life for the last decade, well taken care of by his religious community in Minnesota, Father never ceased his involvement with pro-life issues or his correspondence to his spiritual children still fighting the battles for life on the front lines of the pro-life movement. How precious it was for me to receive his periodic short letters encouraging me to keep up the fighting spirit in the face of so many new challenges. He was always well-aware of the need for funding too so he usually sent $25 and $50 checks with his encouraging notes! I treasure those letters with all my heart. Dr. Brian Clowes of HLI and Mrs. Magaly Llaguno of our Hispanic Division were among his most intimate friends and stayed in regular contact with him and his needs. Countless more were the HLI missionaries around the world who received Father’s letters and notes of encouragement, some of which we will feature in future publications.

To my knowledge, Father’s last public appearance and speech was at HLI’s 35th anniversary banquet held in his honor in Minneapolis on March 25th of 2007. He spoke passionately to his spiritual children using the very same words that Pope John Paul spoke to him when he met with the Holy Father in the early 80s: “You are doing the most important work on earth!” he repeated with fervor. Indeed we are doing that work – it is his work and the true work of the Church. Because of this one man’s indomitable spirit we will not cease doing that work until we too are called home.

Fr. Paul Marx taught the whole world how to be pro-life. He was literally the Patriarch of the pro-life movement. Now it is our turn to take up the mantle of Fr. Marx’s prophetic spirit and, like Elisha who saw his master go to heaven in a fiery chariot, we must turn and part the Jordan with that mantle and get back into the fray – just as the Apostle of Life would want!

[Note: stay tuned for a brand new HLI program in honor of Fr. Marx that will be coming at the end of the month - you won't want to miss it!]

Sincerely,

fr_tom_signature

Rev. Thomas J. Euteneuer
President, Human Life International

Click this link, http://www.hli.org/index.php/component/content/830?task=view to see more of HLI’s tribute to a staunch father of the pro-life movement

PAL Foundation saving lives

Friday, February 19th, 2010

LOVELY is a six-year old girl but she is as tiny as a one year-old baby. Her mother pushes her around in a small wheel chair as she cannot walk nor sit by herself in a regular chair. She was born with no hands and feet—just stubs at the end of her extremities. Her eyes are just slits and you can hardly see her eyeball, and she cannot open her mouth wide enough for a spoon to enter. So she has been sipping her food (blended rice and vegetables) ever since she was an infant and that is why she is so tiny and malnourished. To top it all, she cannot talk because she cannot open her mouth. Her mother says she was only two months pregnant when she had severe infections. She was given massive doses of antibiotics which could have resulted in the multiple disabilities of Lovely.

Lovely was scheduled to leave for Australia last December for surgery—beginning with her mouth, and on to the other defective parts of her body. It has taken almost a year since arrangements began for her to travel, with so many medical check-ups, searching for a hospital that will perform the surgeries, and a foster family that would host her and her mom for several months. All these were possible because of the services of Philippine Airlines Foundation. Lovely and her mom stayed in Welcome House, a crisis shelter for girls and women run by the Good Shepherd Sisters until they were able to leave for Sydney. The host family of Lovely in Australia kept us updated. Although the medical assessment was that Lovely could not be operated on till she reached 14 years old, when she would stop growing, so as not to have her undergo repeat surgeries as she was growing, she was given a lot of other medical attention and advices on how to develop her, feed her so she does not become malnourished, and how to avoid infections. Lovely and her mom returned to the Philippines (to Welcome House) last January, looking healthier and there was certainly a glow in her eyes.

Lovely is not the first child that PAL Foundation has helped to secure such services. Menchu Aguino Sarmiento, the Executive Director since 1999, has assisted dozens of children to have a second chance in life because of her persistence and generosity.

The PAL Foundation was established in 1992, in the aftermath of the Mt. Pinatubo disaster. It received an annual grant of PhP1,000,000 from Philippine Airlines, which it used to give small cash grants for selected projects such as providing water pumps in one barrio in Quezon Province, for micro-finance, and community development.

The PAL Medical Travel and Cargo Grants program benefit charity patients and support medical mission teams. In the past, there had been a ceiling of P100,000 on the worth of tickets or cargo the Foundation could give to a surgical mission team. But the Board realized that the value of the surgeries for impoverished Filipinos in remote areas justified sponsoring entire surgical teams with discounts or free excess baggage for their equipment and supplies. The more complex individual patients are given grants to go to Manila or even abroad should they be so fortunate as to have been accepted for free care elsewhere. In corresponding with the other charities abroad which were giving free care to Filipino children, Menchu developed a network, so that the PAL Foundation has been facilitating the referral and acceptance of patients to Mending Kids International and certain Rotary International Gift of Life programs. She helps these foreign charities evaluate whether a child should go there with a parent or whether the child can just get care here.

But most of the PAL Medical Travel Grantees (especially the adults) go to Manila hospitals. It is hard to get Filipino families in Manila interested in hosting these indigents. Fortunately though, Welcome House in Paco and the Queen of Peace Transient Patient Home in Quezon City shelter the patients though they must still pay for their food and other needs. The number of charity patients of all ages varies in any given year. They are proud to say that they have assisted several conjoint twins (Siamese twins) undergo surgery in the US for separation.

The PAL Foundation has also been giving free cargo for relief goods. Donations run into millions during relief efforts for Typhoons Reming, Frank and Ondoy, as they transported literally tons of relief goods both within the Philippines and coming from abroad. Even during normal times, they give free transport for DSWD goods and even for the Office of Civil Defense when the Air Force C-130 is unavailable. The PAL Foundation is registered with the DSWD as a disaster response and crisis intervention welfare organization.

We, Good Shepherd Sisters assigned to Welcome House pray daily that Lovely and her mom will be able to travel soon so that she can receive the much-needed surgeries and have the chance to sing and dance and play like other children her age. God bless PAL Foundation for the hope they give to our people.

Search