Bishop urges public to unite against anti-terror bill -

Thursday, June 4, 2020

Pastoral Statement of the Bishops of Metro Manila -

Monday, March 16, 2020

Priest refutes senator: ‘Divorce will never be pro-family’ -

Thursday, September 19, 2019

2 priests, 2 pro-life activists arrested trying to save babies inside New Jersey abortion center -

Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Respect and Care for Life 2019 -

Tuesday, January 8, 2019

Over 41 million abortions estimated in 2018, making ‘choice’ world’s leading cause of death -

Thursday, January 3, 2019

Everyone must respect the basic human rights of all human beings, pope says -

Friday, December 14, 2018

Parents of ‘miracle’ micro-preemie thankful to bring home healthy girl -

Thursday, November 29, 2018

WATCH: Drag queen admits he’s ‘grooming’ children at story hour events -

Wednesday, November 28, 2018

Brazil elects pro-life president, despite pressure to legalize abortion -

Tuesday, November 6, 2018

Alfie Evans’ parents to ‘form a relationship’ with hospital, ask supporters to return home: BREAKING -

Friday, April 27, 2018

Couples told: ‘Have courage to fight divorce bill’ -

Wednesday, April 11, 2018


Wednesday, March 14, 2018

Pastoral Statement Against Divorce -

Tuesday, February 27, 2018

Cardinal Tagle to lead walk against killings -

Tuesday, February 13, 2018

49 Abortion Clinics Closed in 2017, 77% of All Abortion Clinics Open in 1991 Have Shut Down -

Thursday, December 21, 2017

Bishop condemns killing of priest -

Wednesday, December 6, 2017

Church urges repentance over rampant killings -

Monday, November 6, 2017

Our Lady of Fatima will be icon at prayer for healing -

Monday, October 30, 2017

Church urges faithful to join ‘heal the nation’ Edsa procession -

Monday, October 16, 2017

Keeping faith in the Court


By Francisco S. Tatad | Posted on Jul. 19, 2013 at 12:01am 

The Supreme Court’s decision to extend indefinitely its status quo ante order on the Reproductive Health Law does not at all rule on the merits of the 13 petitions against it.  But it allows the petitioners to argue their case, without having to feel it’s all over and done with.  The opposing parties not being equal in weight—13 prolife and pro-family groups against the Executive Department and Congress—the petitioners might have felt short-changed had the order been lifted and the Department of Health allowed to implement the disputed law while the hearings were still in progress.  The decision helps to preserve faith in the process.

Malacañang is undoubtedly unhappy about it.  But for them to openly say so helps no one at all. It will be recalled that on the first day of the Oral Arguments, Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno and at least one other Justice did not hesitate to voice their concern about the 15 unelected members of the Court being asked to pass judgment on the constitutionality of a law enacted by Congress and approved by the President.  We do not want Malacañang’s professed disappointment over the decision to magnify that concern.

But there’s more.  Health Secretary Enrique Ona had earlier assured a big women’s conference in Kuala Lumpur that the petitions seeking to nullify the RH law presented but a temporary setback.  He did not expect the Court to rule against the government, and he looked forward to being able to eventually distribute the condoms and other contraceptives, which he had already procured in bulk. In other words, our tax money has been spent.  Fait accompli?

Ona will have to keep his  RH inventory in storage, and be prepared to destroy it  should the government lose its case. Meanwhile, he could perhaps advise his new undersecretary, the former congresswoman and co-author of the RH Law, Janet Garin, to stop regurgitating  the old argumentum ad misericordiam which had inundated the 15th Congress, about poor pregnant women dying because of the lack of an RH law.  We all have had our fill of the propaganda about the poverty, demography, maternal health and other problems the RH law will “solve.”

Only the pro-RH foreign agents that have infiltrated even the independent press as editorial writers and columnists seem unaware that the debate on these issues is over, and that all their lies have already been exposed.  Only one issue remains, and this is what the Court must decide:  Assuming, for the sake of argument, that everything the anti-RH groups have said about poverty, demography and maternal health is wrong (although the evidence is otherwise), and everything the pro-RH groups have said about the same things is right (although the evidence shows the opposite), can Republic Act 10354 stand side by side with the Constitution?

The specific issue is whether the State has the right or the duty to impose birth control on the population, and whether such right or duty, assuming for the sake of argument it exists, can override all the specific constitutional provisions that proclaim the sanctity of family life; uphold the family as the foundation of the nation and as a basic autonomous and inviolable social institution; defend the right of spouses to found a family according to their religious convictions and the demands of responsible parenthood; and equally protect the life of the mother and the life of the unborn from conception.

We need to stay focused on that.  For even the Court could fall prey to the residual effects of the misleading debates which the pro-RH group had framed along non-constitutional lines.   For instance, on the first day of the orals, the Chief Justice spoke of a poor clerk of hers who already had several children but was still childbearing, and receiving a salary of P10,000 a month only.  Then she asked lawyer-petitioner Maria Concepcion Noche whether in her understanding of the law,  she (the CJ) would be committing an “impeachable offense” if she advised her clerk  to take contraceptives in order to stop bearing children. To which Noche, after a brief pause, said, she thought so.







Pro-Life Philippines Foundation, Inc is a non-profit, nationwide organization that functions as an Educational body coordinating pro-life groups, providing information on life issues it also functions as a political and legislative lobby group that advances the principles and policies with the pro-life and pro-family cause.

“What  Can One Person Do?

Every Single person, in his own little way, can do alot to save a life”

+Sr. Mary Pilar Verzosa, RGS

Foundress, Pro-life Phil. Fdn. Inc.

Sept.24, 1944-Sept.9, 2012

We need your help!

PRO-LIFE PHILIPPINES exists mainly because of the overflowing of your donation supporting our programs and services.

PRO-LIFE PHILIPPINES counts on your support to continue operating.

Take inspiration from knowing that for every peso you give, your a part of the mission of SAVING LIVES ONE STEP AT A TIME.

(Pro-Life Philippines Foundation Inc. is a Donee Institution. We will issue a Certificate of Donation for tax deduction purposes upon your request.) For more info call us at 7337027 / 7349425 / 09192337783



Share via email
Leave A Comment